My Photo

Google Site Search

  • Google Site Search
    Google

    WWW
    napaman.typepad.com

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

June 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    


Become a Fan

« Joseph Perrulli Is Up to his Neck in Glassware! | Main | Silenus: Once a wine sot… now a hot wine spot! »

July 16, 2008

Comments

napaman

Much thanks for the feedback. I don't argue that one has to spend $100 to have a good wine experience from Rutherford. Maybe you missed the statement above: "One thing I usually find at this annual tasting is that price is not always a perfect indicator of quality. Almost every year, I blindly identify a $40-$50 wine that scores as many points as a triple-digit-dollar wine. And this year was no exception." But thanks for visiting napaman.com and for sharing your thoughts.

kai

Very nice article but not very realistic in the sense that very few can buy a bottle of Scarecrow for $100

The comments to this entry are closed.